Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Why not instead add `loop.sock_close()`?
It wouldn't help if the program calls `socket.close()` somewhere. This can happen easily in big code bases. Ideally (at least I think so) we need to provide a guarantee that the socket object can't be closed at all (or be closed in a controlled manner) if it's being operated by asyncio/event-loop. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32038> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
