STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: I merged my PR 4421 which is based on Serhiy's PR 4420. Thank you Serhiy for your reviews!
-- Serhiy Storchaka: "We could split patterns on two parts and create both matchers (...) I don't know whether it is worth to do." My use bisect is to find a regression using the test.bisect tool. According to my tests, the fastest set().__contains__ matcher is always used, except of test_json. If you bisect a bug in test_json, it will work, but just be a little bit slower. Honestly, I don't think that we can go further in term of optimization. In my tests, it seems like creating the matcher function and filter all tests take less than 1 second, so it's enough for my use case ;-) ---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31324> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
