Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Follow up: this also came up on https://bugs.python.org/issue32030#msg306763, 
and I think Victor and I are on the same page now :)

Since MainInterpreterConfig is currently still a private struct, we can store 
the existing C level config state directly in there for now, and then look at 
upgrading to Python types on a case by case basis.

Once they're all both consolidated *and* upgraded, then we can consider making 
the new incremental configuration API public.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32096>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to