New submission from Glenn Linderman <v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com>:
At least as far back as Python 3.1, the description for Template strings
(section 6.1.5 in version 3.6.4rc1 docs) starts by differentiating what
Template strings do, as:
Instead of the normal %-based substitutions, Templates support $-based
substitutions, using the following rules:
Since this immediately follows a section describing the "Custom String
Formatting" and the "Format Specification Mini-Language", which does a type of
substitutions that is {} based, rather than % based, it is hard to grasp
exactly why %-based substitutions would be considered "normal". Of course, I
know why, due to the % operator, but for someone just reading through chapter
6, it is a reference that raises the mental question "Huh? What is normal
%-based substitution? Are Templates abnormal, if %-based substitutions are
normal? What did I miss? The previous section was about {}-based substitutions?
Are they abnormal, too? What are normal %-based substitutions, anyway?" rather
than helping to describe what Templates are and do.
----------
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 307922
nosy: docs@python, v+python
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Template string docs refer to "normal %-based substitutions"
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32263>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
