Marc-Andre Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On 2008-09-09 17:54, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > I don't think this needs to be resolved before 2.6, not without a > pronouncement from a lawyer advising the PSF. Layman's analyses of legal > issues are void. > > Thus lowering the priority.
That's an interesting argument :-) What makes you think that a layman's judgment over a layman's analysis is not void as well ? Rather than arguing about the necessity of including the license of a 3rd party file that we intend to include in a wide-spread software release, wouldn't it be easier to just add the file and be done with it, like I suggested at the very beginning of this discussion ? ---------- title: Add MS EULA to the list of third-party licenses in the Windows installer -> Add MS EULA to the list of third-party licenses in the Windows installer _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3617> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
