New submission from Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com>: There's a fairly extensive discussion here: https://github.com/python/asyncio/pull/465
In short, asyncio.run() is a pretty straightforward addition, so let's add it. The discussion was more focused on the asyncio.run_forever() proposal. I now think that it shouldn't be implemented in asyncio. Instead we should fix cases where 'loop.run_forever' is usually required. Mainly that's servers, and they are easily fixable by making "Server" an async context manager and implementing a "server.serve_forever()" method. That way, with asyncio.run(): async def serve_something(): async with asyncio.start_server(...) as server: await server.serve_forever() asyncio.run(serve_something()) # No loop.run_forever()! ---------- assignee: yselivanov components: asyncio messages: 308256 nosy: asvetlov, lukasz.langa, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Implement asyncio.run() type: enhancement versions: Python 3.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32314> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com