Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Rather than arguing about the necessity of including the license > of a 3rd party file that we intend to include in a wide-spread > software release, wouldn't it be easier to just add the file > and be done with it, like I suggested at the very beginning of > this discussion ?
It's certainly easier to defer the decision than to take action, especially when we don't *need* to take action (Python works fine whether or not the file is included). There are so many more important things to do. OTOH, contributions are welcome. ---------- title: Add MS EULA to the list of third-party licenses in the Windows installer -> Add MS EULA to the list of third-party licenses in the Windows installer _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3617> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
