Robert Schuppenies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > What's the actual difference that this change makes?
It would provide more accurate results, even in the light of being not perfect. > [..] each small_int takes a complete PyLongObject. If that was also > considered in long_sizeof, the computation would happen to be > completely correct for bool also. So how should this bug report be handled? Provide a patch to handle getsizeof correctly for small_ints? 'wont fix' because there are issues anyway? I would prefer the former and try to come up with a patch if you think it is worthwhile. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3690> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
