Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: So the bug is actually in the multiprocessing module rather than the unittest. If HAVE_SEM_OPEN is not defined then SemLock is never built into _multiprocessing.so, but multiprocessing/syncronize.py unconditionally depends on its presence.
I guess _multiprocessing could always define a dummy SemLock or synchronize.py could check before it depends on it. (it would be great to see this fixed for 2.6) -d _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3770> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
