Josh Rosenberg <shadowranger+pyt...@gmail.com> added the comment: Note: Obviously, defining __index__ without defining __int__ is a little strange (it's *equivalent* to int, but can't be *coerced* to int?), so yet another fix would be addressing #20092 so it wouldn't be possible for a type to define __index__ without (implicitly) defining __int__.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33002> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
