Robert Smallshire <r...@sixty-north.com> added the comment:
I've recently run into this issue impeding duck-typing between int and float
again, when used in conjunction the int.__pow__, which may variously return an
int or float depending on the value - not the type - of the arguments.
This is succinctly demonstrated by this example:
>>> (10 ** -2).is_integer()
False
>>> (10 ** 2).is_integer()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_integer'
I hear the argument about Python being harder to learn if more methods are
supported on the built-in types - and perhaps float.is_integer should never
have been added, but now its there, but I think Python is harder to learn and
teach in the presence of these differences. Is is harder to learn "Real numbers
support an is_integer() method", than it is "float supports an is_integer()
method"?
I'm happy to put in the work bring my original patches up-to-date, or create a
PR depending on what current process is.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26680>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
