Zooko O'Whielacronx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Because that's exactly what lsb_release does as well.
You must know something about common lsb_release implementations that I don't. As far as I saw in the LSB documentation, it is required to print out information in a certain format, but how it is implemented is totally up to the distribution in question. You give examples of SuSE and Fedora as not having /etc/lsb-release files, and I'm sure you are right, but I happen to know that both of them have compliant lsb_release executables (and that they have had for many releases). So, the patch that I've submitted will definitely work correctly for those two distributions, although it will pay the price of having to spawn a subprocess and then wait for the lsb_release executable to do its work (however it does it). However, presumably your SuSE- and Fedora- specific techniques will give correct answers on those platforms faster than the generic lsb_release would. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1322> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
