Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Why not export and use the canonical way of > sigemptyset/sigfillset/sigaddset/sigdelset/sigismember instead of pushing for > more potential non-conformant code?
I agree this is the proper fix and that's what I plan to do in Python 3.8. For Python 3.7 and earlier, though, we cannot add new features anymore, which is why I'm leaning towards a variant of the patch I showed above (which also minimizes the risk for regressions by introducing and using a new API). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33329> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
