Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lape...@henki.fr> added the comment: This change does add built-in types but I think it's a reasonable expectation as a python user to be able to do reversed(dict(a=1, b=20) since the order is know defined in the specifications. It seems inconsistent to have an order on dict, views and not have reversed work on them.
It does increase fat in the interpreter, but the change is really simple and does not really increase its complexity or make it really harder to maintain. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33462> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
