nathan rogers <nathan.roger...@gmail.com> added the comment: Can anyone give me a legitimate answer as to why this would be expected behavior? When at any point would you ever need that?
If the list is local, you already have the thing. If it isn't local, you can pass it to a function by reference. So then, why would you ever need N references to the same thing? Are you going to run out? Are your functions buying tickets to the reference of my thing show, and you're afraid those tickets will run out? What is this? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33636> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
