Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com> added the comment:
Serhiy: thanks for the fuller story about the optimizations in place now. I'll repeat my earlier plea: providing a way to disable optimization is beneficial for tooling like coverage.py, and also for helping us to ensure that the optimizer is working correctly. I doubt anyone commenting here would be happy with a C compiler that optimized with no off-switch. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue2506> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
