Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:
If C level iterator implementations in the standard library natively handled Ctrl-C (to cope with naive third party C level iterator consumers), and so did C level iterator consumers in the standard library (to cope with with naive third party C level iterators), I agree this wouldn't be that useful. However, if folks are going to actively oppose making it possible for users to interrupt tight loops over non-Python iterators that are "bigger or slower than convenient" on the grounds of it making the C code more complicated to solve a problem they personally consider to be purely theoretical (despite other core developers telling them otherwise), then special casing known-infinite iterators is better than nothing. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33939> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
