Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I just encountered this as well. The way catch_warnings is implemented is a bit "dumb" in how it treats _filter_version (it calls _filters_mutated even if the active filters are not actually changed when entering catch_warnings). More significantly, _filter_version is not fine-grained enough. If some warning was already displayed, calling catch_warnings() should not later cause that same warning to be displayed again unless the filters were modified in such a way, during catch_warnings(), that that warning should be displayed (e.g. changed to 'always'). I'm not really sure what to do about that though. Maybe the "filter version" should be per-warning? Currently the value assigned to each warning in __warningregistry__ is not used (it is just set to True), so maybe that could actually be used for this. ---------- nosy: +erik.bray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue29672> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
