New submission from Stig Johan Berggren <sti...@gmail.com>:
`get()` on a ConfigParser object behaves differently from `get()` on a section. The former raises an exception when the key does not exist and no fallback has been explicitly set. The latter returns None, with no option to raise an error for missing keys. I think this is confusing, and that both classes should have the same behaviour. I prefer raising an error, as it makes it easier to find errors such as typos in config files. In addition, the docs state that the "parser-level `get` method provides a custom, more complex interface, maintained for backwards compatibility". The SectionProxy `get` method internally uses the parser-level `get`, so it seems unlikely that it is only maintained for backwards compatibility. My proposed change is not backwards compatible, as any code that relies on a None being returned when a key does not exist would have to make this explicit through the fallback argument in `get`. Here is the current behaviour in the latest build (3.8.0a0): >>> import configparser >>> c = configparser.ConfigParser() >>> c.add_section('spam') >>> c['spam'].get('eggs') # Returns None >>> c['spam']['eggs'] Traceback (most recent call last): ... KeyError: 'eggs' >>> c.get('spam', 'eggs') Traceback (most recent call last): ... configparser.NoOptionError: No option 'eggs' in section: 'spam' >>> ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 322448 nosy: Stig Johan Berggren priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: configparser: SectionProxy.get is silent on missing options type: behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34242> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com