Nick Edds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I had very little experience with the processing module prior to the creation of this patch, and because pool objects are listed last in the documentation, I did not read about them because I saw a way to achieve what I wanted using Process. But having looked at the documentation for Pool, I think you are correct that it would be a much cleaner solution to the problem, as I was essentially implementing a Pool myself. I will post a new patch to reflect this change tomorrow. I will also submit the patch to take advantage of the fact that the multiprocessing module is included in Python2.6, as opposed to my prior patch which was designed for Python2.5 which required the user to get the processing module. And in the patch, as before, multiprocess will not be default, but it will be something the user can enable via the command line.
_______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3448> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
