Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I'm not too invested in any changes happening at this point, actually. :)  
Mostly I happened to be reading through the commit and noticed the 
inconsistency.  If I had reviewed the PR then I would have asked that it be 
fixed.  So I figured I'd mention it.

FWIW, I don't expect it would cause any problems.  It could result in a 
different (between the two implementations) Task repr if the name's type (a str 
subclass) implements __repr__.  There's also the possibility of side-effects 
(from the implementation of the name's type).  Neither is a big deal 
(especially the latter since it's *not* a common use case).  On the other had, 
the matter is made moot by using PyUnicode_CheckExact(). :)

----------
resolution:  -> fixed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34270>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to