Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
I agree. We should definitely document it as a change, but I don't think there's anything useful you can do in the case of a flush failing anyway, so it seems unlikely that anyone could depend on the return value. Returning None for success and exception on error sounds like a good change. Technically this is no longer returning zero, as previously documented, so if anyone wants to get *really* pedantic, we're not returning the "failed" result for success ;) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue2122> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
