Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html#regular-packages Regular packages have __init__.py files and namespace packages do not. "Implicit non-namespace packages" aren't really A Thing. This design choice is deliberate; namespace packages themselves have no physical location so there's no place to put resources within them. Is there a problem with adding empty __init__.py files to regular packages with resources? ---------- resolution: -> wont fix stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34534> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
