Steven D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> added the comment:
For what its worth, I'm +1 with Serhiy that we raise an exception on a non-string argument, including the case where the caller forgets to provide a reason at all. I don't think that @skip with no reason was ever intended to work (it certainly wasn't documented as working) and as this only effects tests, not production code, I don't think we ought to be constrained by "bug compatibility" concerns. Fixing broken tests is easier than fixing broken production code. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34596> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
