Erwan Le Pape <lepaperw...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Great! My only concern with that is marshalling of untrusted data at runtime (I know, you shouldn't do that) can become a much more expensive operation. Is there any internal use of marshal beyond .pycs used at runtime by the core interpreter that might be affected by such a change? If not, it seems (to me) an acceptable modification of marshal and I'll submit a PR for it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34686> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
