Gabriel Marko <marko.gabriel...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@serhiy.storchaka: IMO, the problem isn't the master/slave terminology itself
but the way how the changes were introduced (no discussion) and the
justification ("diversity reasons"???).
IMO this is the next level: https://bugs.python.org/issue34660 and I can't
imagine what comes next. I find this nonsensical and I'm very disappointed that
this ideological nonsense is infecting Python.
IMO the core developers should make a clear statement about this (either pro or
contra). Once it's made, I'll have no other choice than respect that stance and
act accordingly. Saying that "there will be not more discussions" or sending
people to twitter like Guido did is not a solution and it's rather damaging the
Python community and its reputation. :(
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34605>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
