Thomas Gläßle <tho...@coldfix.de> added the comment: Thanks for your response. I have opened a PR at [1] that would remove the re.escape such that the implementation matches the documentation if you decide that this is fine.
[1]: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/9358 Personally, I would go even further and always add the `(\..*)?$` suffix (instead of only `$`) to make it easier to match all modules in a package which is probably the most important use-case for the case of packages. What do you think? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34624> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
