thautwarm <yaoxiansa...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I'm in favor of this idea for prospective extensions that could be implemented through this brand-new ast.Constant. Actually I used to expect a more general ast.Constant when I was manipulating ASTs half a year ago, at that time my job is to make staging functions that take some user-defined types as constants(in these scenes, these types are definitely immutable and permanent) to gain performance improvements and avoid redundant allocations, and what I exactly wanted is such an ast.Constant. ---------- nosy: +thautwarm _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32892> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
