Karthikeyan Singaravelan <[email protected]> added the comment:
Since Nick had some issue on adding a message to the issue I am adding the
email sent to me as a message below :
(sorry I can't see how to post a reply message on the bugs page, I'm still new
to this)
anyhow here's what I wanted to post:
Thanks for finding the bug!
Maybe a preferable behaviour would be to split the error types
- an IOError could still pass (I'm really not sure what the ideal treatment in
that case is
- a Unicode error would still print a warning but it would be something like a
generic 'warning: non-standard text found in warning text so only printing
this' (I'm sure there's something better sounding / more consistent with other
warnings but I don't know them that well)
so the code would look something like:
except (UnicodeError):
message = "non-standard text found in warning text so only printing this"
file.write(formatwarning(message, category, filename, lineno, line))
except (IOError):
pass # the file (probably stderr) is invalid - this warning
gets lost.
but I'm not sure if an IOError inside the UnicodeError handling would still be
caught (?)
anyhow I'm not sure how standard/appropriate a generic warning would be within
the broader context of python (?) I think for us we'll probably just bite the
bullet and switch to python3 to avoid this kind of thing since we'll
potentially have a lot of unicode messages in the near future.
thanks again,
Nick Parslow
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34752>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
