Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:
> Taking an algorithm in wide use that's already known to get a top score on > SMHasher and fiddling it to make a "slight" improvement in one tiny Python > test doesn't make sense to me. What I'm doing is the most innocent change: just applying a fixed permutation on the *input* of the hash function. I'm not changing the actual hashing algorithm. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34751> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
