Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Oh, do we not consider __warningsregistry__ an implementation detail? >
I guess you could view it that way. I just know I find it extremely annoying for testing for the exact reasons JP mentions; it's unexpected if you don't know about it. If we made __warningsregistry__ about just recording what warnings have been raised and not include filter information (which I what I think you are suggesting) then it would still server its purpose, albeit for probably a small performance penalty. Probably whomever came up with it over-optimized and just didn't realize that it might play havoc with testing. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4180> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
