Karthikeyan Singaravelan <tir.kar...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for the report. As far as I can see from the RFC month seems to follow three letter code. Is there a part of RFC where Python is not compliant? I can't find any related issues or RFC links allowing month format specified in the report. Can you please add the relevant part of RFC or links if any? Date RFC 6265 5.1.1 : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265.html#section-5.1.1 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34951> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
