Valentin Zhao <jmsq...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I am better just waiting you guys fixing that because it is not urgent. On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:12 PM Jason R. Coombs <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Jason R. Coombs <jar...@jaraco.com> added the comment: > > Also, I would argue that this is an enhancement request and not a bug - > that the prior expectation was that the .pth file is encoded in whatever > encoding the system expects by default, and that adding support for a > standardized encoding for .pth files is a new feature. > > As another aside: Valentin, the technique you're using to manage packages > is likely to run into issues with certain packages - in particular any > packages that rely on their own `.pth` files to invoke behavior, such as > future_fstrings (https://pypi.org/project/future-fstrings/). I learned > about this issue in (https://github.com/jaraco/rwt/issues/29), which is > why the rwt project adds a `sitecustomize.py` to the target directory that > ensures .pth files are run. Just FYI. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue35131> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35131> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
