STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:

> Finally, since the the port to 3.6 was a mistake, I will revert that.

I wrote PR 11499 but I closed it because PR #11501 has been merged, but yeah, 
maybe a revert is the best option for 3.6.

No problem, the status change of the 3.6 branch is very new, and not everybody 
got the memo ;-)
https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches

See this discussion:
https://discuss.python.org/t/remove-needs-backport-to-3-6-label/563

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to