Tal Einat <talei...@gmail.com> added the comment:

The recently merged PR GH-10454 significantly reduced the overhead of 
Squeezer's write() interception.  The overhead should now be entirely 
insignificant.

IMO that deals with the "... and is slow" part of this issue.  We've still to 
decide whether the auto-squeezing is "too aggressive".

I'll mention again that Raymond has brought up several additional important 
issues in the comments, that IMO should be processed into new issues and/or a 
roadmap for IDLE.  It's Terry's decision how to proceed, but I'll be happy to 
help with whatever direction he chooses.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35196>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to