Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
It's been a somewhat well-known idiom for modules to replace themselves in sys.modules with an object that implements some special behaviors (e.g. dynamic loading). This "just works" and AFAIK people have been doing this for ages. Typically such classes just implement enough machinery so that "import foo; print(foo.bar)" works -- everything else (__file__, __doc__ etc.) is optional. So I think tools should be robust when they inspect sys.modules and not crash or whine loudly when they find something that's missing a few advanced attributes. That said, if there's something *useful* we could put in the special attributes for e.g. typing.io, I'm not against it. But I don't think this is a bug. ---------- priority: normal -> low _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35806> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
