Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@Pablo: Thanks; I saw the PR. It looks as though the troublesome line long x = i_result * b; is still there in that PR, though. Or am I misreading? The difficulty here is that the check for overflow has to happen as a means of preventing invoking undefined behaviour; it doesn't really work to invoke the undefined behaviour first and then check to see what went wrong. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35959> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
