Karthikeyan Singaravelan <[email protected]> added the comment:
No problem, after some debugging the statement finally executed is
'exec(compile("set.add(0)", "foo.py", "exec"))' . In Python interpreter this
will give the expected error. It also gives the same error before
coverage.start() [0] and gives a different one as in the report once the
statement is executed after coverage.start(). So this might be something to do
with coverage and I have less knowledge about the internals.
I am closing this as third party since I couldn't see any issue with CPython
and you might want to follow up coverage issue tracker. Thanks for the report
though!
[0]
https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/blob/f12db7fd4b3ab288f7f770f7138062951feaa6c9/coverage/cmdline.py#L639
----------
resolution: -> third party
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35965>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
