Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Note also that Eric and I haven't failed to agree with Victor on an API, as Victor hasn't actually written a concrete proposal *for* a public API (neither as a PR updating PEP 432, nor as a separate PEP). The current implementation does NOT follow the PEP as written, because _Py_CoreConfig ended up with all the settings in it, when it's supposed to be just the bare minimum needed to get the interpreter to a point where it can run Python code that only accesses builtin and frozen modules. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue22213> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
