Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I concur with all the other -1 comments and will mark this a closed. FWIW, we generally discourage sweeping across the library with minor rewrites. Guido articulated a principle of "holistic refactoring" where we make code improvements while working on the module as a whole. This helps makes sure that code changes are made in the context of a thorough understanding of what the module is trying to do. This also helps us reduce maintenance-induced-bugs where minor code adjustments create new bugs that weren't there before. Thank you for taking a look at the source and please continue to do so. If you find a specific case that is problematic, feel free to post that one particular case. That said, a better use of time is to take one of the many open tracker issues, research it, and propose a fix. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36039> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com