Karthikeyan Singaravelan <tir.kar...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks Mario for the details. I had almost the same patch while writing msg336300 :) There were no test case failures except that I had resolved it in the constructor storing the string representation as a separate variable and also while calling the function which could be avoided as per your approach to just store the string and resolve once during function call. I think this is a good way to do this. Are you planning to create a PR or shall I go ahead with this? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35512> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
