Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lape...@henki.fr> added the comment: @rhettinger > It's possible to have non-sortable elements in the set, so you'll either need > to sort on the repr of the elements or have a fallback
Yes, it is the repr that is used in the loop and that what's the sorting needs to be done against. @Windson Yang > we should compare their repr() without sort() like now. I'm not sure to understand, can you provide more information about what you are thinking of? Is there a reason to add 2.7, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 to versions affected ? As far as I can tell, this is a new feature and should only go in 3.8. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36230> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
