Michael Foord <mich...@voidspace.org.uk> added the comment:

> On 30 Mar 2019, at 23:48, Michael Foord <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Michael Foord <mich...@voidspace.org.uk> added the comment:
> 
> An auto-magic cache clearing mechanism is really tempting. I tend to agree 
> with Raymond though, if code needs and progress a cache clearing mechanism it 
> should be treated and accessible. 

* exposes (not progress)
* tested  (not treated)

Sorry. 
> 
> They're are probably some problematic caches still within unittest however. 
> Do test results still keep alive all tracebacks until test reporting?
> 
> ----------
> 
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36485>
> _______________________________________

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36485>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to