Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> added the comment:
lxml has a couple of nice features here: - all tags in a namespace: "{namespace}*" - a local name 'tag' in any (or no) namespace: "{*}tag" - a tag without namespace: "{}tag" - all tags without namespace: "{}*" "{*}*" is also accepted but is the same as "*". Note that "*" is actually allowed as an XML tag name by the spec, but rare enough to hijack it for this purpose. I've actually never seen it used anywhere in the wild. lxml's implementation isn't applicable to ElementTree (searching has been subject to excessive optimisation), but it shouldn't be hard to extend the one in ET's ElementPath.py module, as well as Element.iter() in ElementTree.py, to support this kind of tag comparison. PR welcome. lxml's tests are here (and in the following test methods): https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/359f693b972c2e6b0d83d26a329d2d20b7581c48/src/lxml/tests/test_etree.py#L2911 Note that they actually test the deprecated .getiterator() method for historical reasons. They should probably call .iter() instead these days. lxml's ElementPath implementation is under src/lxml/_elementpath.py, but the tag comparison itself is done elsewhere in Cython code (here, in case it matters:) https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/359f693b972c2e6b0d83d26a329d2d20b7581c48/src/lxml/apihelpers.pxi#L921-L1048 ---------- stage: -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue28238> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com