New submission from Thomas Moreau <thomas.moreau.2...@gmail.com>:
The current implementation of the semaphore_tracker creates a new process for
each children.
The easy fix would be to pass the _pid to the children but the current
mechanism to check if the semaphore_tracker is alive relies on waitpid which
cannot be used in child processes (the semaphore_tracker is only a sibling of
these processes). The main issue is to have a reliable check that either:
The pipe is open. This is what is done here by sending a message. I don't
know if there is a more efficient way to check it.
Check that a given pid is alive. As we cannot rely on waitpid, I don't see
an efficient mechanism.
I propose to add a PROBE command in the semaphore tracker. When the pipe is
closed, the send command will fail, meaning that the semaphore tracker is down.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 340543
nosy: tomMoral
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: semaphore_tracker is not reused by child processes
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.8
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36668>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
