New submission from John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: r54137 replaced a comment in urllib2.py with a misleading comment. The comment now implies the .insort() in question achieves the goal specified in the new comment. That's not true, which was the reason the original comment was there in the first place.
At least replace the comment with the original comment. Alternatively, (correctly) resolve the question in the original comment somehow (for example by removing the .handlers attribute -- but since .handlers is misnamed in not having an initial underscore, it may have tempted people to use it, even though it's undocumented, hence private). ---------- messages: 76783 nosy: jjlee severity: normal status: open title: misleading comment in urllib2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4496> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com