Alexey Muranov <alexey.mura...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I've noticed some faults in my code examples: `super(__class__, __class__)` instead of a more appropriate `super(__class__, cls)`, forgotten `return` before `super(__class__, self).foo(*args, **kwarg)`, maybe there are more. I cannot edit previous comments, but this does not affect the main point. I've stumbled on this behaviour in a situation where it actually poses me a problem. However, here is some analogy: if a calculator returns 0 as the result of a multiplication of any number by 1, this cannot be justified by saying that no one needs to multiply numbers by 1 anyway. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36827> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
