Matthias Bussonnier <bussonniermatth...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> There are other projects that have already added a fix for the new parameter > positionally. If we add it to be the last (that still will break the old > call) we would break them again. Understandable > The documentation never documented the arguments for the code type (probably > on purpose) Understandable as well, just thinking that a CYA sentence in types.rst: "These types are not supposed to be instantiated outside of CPython internals and constructor signatures can vary between python versions. And maybe the docstrings. I rarely open the documentation on python.org and work most of the time by calling `help()` or `?` in IPython, so having some information saying this is non-public in the docstring would make sens to me. I'm happy to do it if it is deemed useful. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36886> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
