Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> vx1920 <vx1...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > "sitevendor" is required because "sitecustomize" already "taken": imagine > organization XYZ , they install Python/Anaconda for workers in XYZ. Admin > in XYZ places some XYZ-specific code into "sitecustomize". I don't think it's common situation. If distribution want to add such "admin"-customization, distributors can implement such additional customization in sitecustomize.py, or even in site.py. For example, Ubuntu uses customized site.py and sitecustomize.py. Is there some discussion in Anaconda developers about proposing "sitevendor" is upstream (CPython)? Or is it just your idea? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36891> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
