Cheryl Sabella <cheryl.sabe...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Since -r doesn't usually take a value, what would be the best way to implement this? The current implementation always adds -r, so not including '-r' would need to retain the current behavior of randomization. Would something like '--no-random' be a good way to implement this? That would be different than how the program handles the -u or -j because the '--no-random' would have to be removed from regrtest_args. ---------- nosy: +cheryl.sabella versions: +Python 3.8 -Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue17774> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
